Tuesday, August 05, 2008

The Times They Are A Changin'?!

I’ve got a couple of things to get on my soapbox about at the moment, so over the next week or so, I’m going to be exploring/venting/discussing these. I am interested in your opinions on it, but I’m saying at the outset that if you become abusive in any way shape or form towards anyone personally, your post will not be published.

So, let’s begin with The Salvation Army as it currently stands in worship on a Sunday. I (and many others) believe that the things that make The Salvation Army distinct and unique seem to be the very things many are fighting against and getting rid of.

For instance, let’s look at the Songsters – some of our Corps are busy trying to build the best worship band they can, at the cost of Songsters (or choir), with many of our songster groups closing down entirely. The same is happening with our brass bands, our timbrels and many other groups that have been successful ministries for many many years. And there is a rather loud group – which I’d like to think were in the minority, but are so loud they seem to be the majority – that say “good riddance! They’re irrelevant – let’s move on!”… But should we move on from what is tried and tested to work within our movement? Why are we getting rid of them? Is it because they are irrelevant? Or is it because they don’t seem to be as cool as what the church down the road has?

Now before we go on – I need to say that I am a great fan of modern worship songs – not such a great fan of the big mega-churches idea of worship songs – but a big fan of worship songs nonetheless. For instance – the work of the Soteira guys is brilliant – and Nathan Rowe and the team are an absolute asset to the Army. So as you continue to read, I ask you keep that in mind.

For those who argue our old ministries are irrelevant, I want to tell you a story about this weekend at my Corps. We were blessed by a visit from The Salvation Army Ringwood Corps Vocal Praise group (read songsters). This group sang many “oldie but goodie” songs, some of which had been arranged with a more contemporary feel, taking many of us back to some of our best Army memories. They also sang some great up-tempo gospel songs. And through their ministry, and that of their Corps Officers, Majors Colin & Di Corkery, a member of our congregation, a local man from our community, who has been battling the storms of life for some time now, was deeply moved. So deeply moved, he requested prayer and spent a large amount of time with our Officer praying and exploring faith issues. He joined the group for lunch and the afternoon concert where he enjoyed the ministry of the South Barwon Corps Band and the Ringwood Corps Vocal Praise group. Not relevant?! Seemed pretty relevant to him!

Whilst we’re on the “not relevant” bandwagon – let’s have a look at some trends in Australia & the Western world’s “non-church” cultures:

· With recent hit TV shows such as “Choir of Hard Knocks” & “Battle of the Choirs”, Community Choirs across Australia are experiencing an increase of numbers of people joining. So if the Songsters aren’t relevant, why aren’t Corps establishing a “Community Choir?” By merely changing the focus slightly from being a tool for enrichment in our meetings, they can become an Evangelistic tool, and in the same way continue to enrich our meetings!
· Each year, there is a National Brass Band Championships – this competition is not dying out with age! In fact bands such as the “Tramways Band” are seeing increasing numbers of young people join. Schools are using brass players in swing bands, orchestras and the likes. The Salvation Army once held the monopoly on the “best” brass players in the state, and perhaps even in the country – a monopoly that is lost now as more and more of our Corps Bands close. Kids are still learning brass at school, there is still the demand, but we’ve missed the boat. Not relevant?! Not appreciated more like it. Bring on the Melbourne Staff Band’s visit to South Barwon later in the year, I CAN’T WAIT!
· Timbrels – a hotly contended topic within The Salvation Army. My personal opinion for you Salvos out there is that unless you are a bando – or a former timbrel player – I’m not interested in your comments that Timbrels are irrelevant. Now there’s always been a “love/hate” relationship between the timbrels and band in our Corps – but even some of the most hardened “bando’s” who taunt that timbrel players are talent less and useless – will often when pushed admit it is in jest and that The Salvation Army has suffered a great loss by losing part of our culture. Interestingly enough, many of the “mainstream” churches are starting tambourine groups, some of which even call them “timbrel groups” and whenever I am out with friends and tell them I’m a Salvo, the first question I get asked is “Do you play the tambourine?”. Anzac Day – the old diggers in Geelong were teary when they saw the timbrel girls back. Not relevant?! Not appreciated.

Do we need to move with the times? Absolutely! Do we need to do church exactly the same way all the mega-churches and other local churches in our community model? Absolutely not!

It’s time we reclaimed some of our uniqueness and embraced it for what it is. It’s time we stopped trying to be cool in the eyes of whatever the latest church fad is (and let’s face it they change every two minutes!) and start doing what it is that we’ve done so well for so many years… let’s take back our culture and make it relevant. For if we don’t,… we’re no better than the other Community Churches out there… but that’s for another day!

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Great blog. Couldn't agree with you more and thanks for having the courage to bring this issue into focus in these times when those of us who enjoyed the value of these avenues of service in the past have had no choice but to sit back and be told we are no longer relevant. Who is relevant? All who have given their lives entirely to Christ and have gifts to offer whether they be the gifts that others dislike or not. At the Corps that I attend there has been no "timbrel brigade' for some time but one of the older folk is now starting one up and I say good on her for having the courage to do so. Let us be a unique "SALVATION Army" that doesn't just follow the crowd.

Simon Mapleback said...

Yeah well said Sarah!!

I'm with you all the way - glad you use your soap box, keep it close!

Anonymous said...

Band, songsters and timbrels only become irrelevant when the group and the leaders make it so. The undelying attitudes of the group and leaders (as well as the music selected) will determine relevancy.

At our Corps, the songsters have combined with the worship group to present items, as have the timbrels. The band and worship band have combined.

It's a contextual thing - getting the group/combinations/music right in each context will make it relevant.

Hope that made sense!

Buff :-)

Anonymous said...

Sarah - great comments. I agree with you 100%. Instead of following the latest 'fad' from other Churches (even other Corps) we must listen to God. God is a God of love and understaning.
Everything is relevant, worthwhile and used by Him when we listen and use ALL the gifts we as the Salvation Army and individuals have been given for His Glory within the Corps/Church and the Community we live and minister to in His Name.
You are in my prayers
Love kaye

Anonymous said...

Shouldn't the greater concern be the dwindling attendance at Salvos and other churches.

Social diversification suggests the choices of worship and music you mention will just translate to a choice of audience and membership. Seems to be little point in debating the optimal mixture of tradition and other influences. It'll get down do how many groups of people you have resources to "market" to. And the wash up will be that many will still feel rejected or uncomfortable.

Nothing you mention is really on the critical path of inner transformation. Window dressing can be attractive, but ultimately it is nothing.

An alternative model of church is required. One that can accept all people.

Joel Clifford said...

Hey Sarah,

Thanks for sharing your thoughts here.

I want to add a bit of balance to the discussion here though.

While I agree that The Salvation Army should remain unique and distinctive, I truly believe that stubbornly holding on to our old ways will only serve to alienate us from the culture around us. We need to seek new ways of being distinctive.

Times are certainly changing around us. This is no more evident than when we look at the statistics about Salvation Army worship services. Over the last 10 years we have seen a 20% decline in attendances. My concern is that if we dig our heels in and insist on doing what we have always done and retaining the ‘traditional’ Salvo distinctives, we will continue to get what we are currently getting (decline).

I believe much of the closure of the groups you have mentioned is not caused so much by a decision from on high, but forced by a lack of numbers caused by a lack of interest. I also disagree that only bandspeople and timbrelists have valid thoughts on the relevancy of these traditions. As someone who plays neither a brass instrument or a timbrel and knows many, many others just like me, I feel that we are also should have a say in the relevancy of these traditions. Of course those involved will contend their relevancy, but surely those of us in the congregation have as much right to speak to what is relevant to us also.

I am not sure that William and Catherine Booth ever meant for us to have brass bands and timbrels and songsters as a part of our worship services for eternity. As I look at the spirit of what the Booths and the early Salvation Army began, I see a tradition of innovation and of being on the cutting edge. Just as John Calvin took a loathsome instrument out of the taverns and used it to play worship music (an instrument still equally loathsome but much loved by some, the organ), so to did the early Salvation Army take the brass bands out of the culture around them and used them to make worshipping God through music once again relevant to the culture they were in. I believe that we too should be continuing this innovation and taking what is popular in the community and culture around us and incorporating it into our worship services

While I agree that some of what makes us distinctive is enjoyed by many on special occasions (who doesn’t love a brass band playing Christmas carols at the train station, and bands and timbrels on ANZAC day) I am not sure that many of these people are willing to sign on to a movement that continues to insist that this is the way we must do things now. New wineskins for new the new wine are what’s needed here.

Lets continue in our tradition of innovation and transformation and seek to continually reach our communities by that which is most relevant to the culture around us.

Joel

Sarah Eldridge said...

Thanks for your feedback guys - it's been appreciated and considered! :)

Anon - Go the older lady starting her timbrel brigade - we need more people like her - willing to have the courage to do what she feels God is calling her to!

Simon - It always is ;)

Buff - perfect person to respond as your Corps is one of the few that has been able to fully connect old and new... thanks for taking the time to write!

Kaye - couldn't agree more! :)

David & Joel - while we're on the dwindling numbers subject - I'm writing a blog as we speak about that very issue - and it's connection with this issue!

Joel - I agree and disagree with you, but more on that in the blog. As for my comment about not having a valid point - I meant it more in a criticism sense - that people who have never been involved in these groups can at times be critical - without ever having experienced what being a member of the groups brings to your life - the fellowship, the skills, the friendship, the support - and thus when stating "they're not relevant" they don't fully grasp why those groups often continue. The point wasn't even really arguing just for timbrels and brass - but for being an Army on the move again - an Army that says "stick what the other churches think, we're doing what God requires of us" - and I believe that's EXACTLY what William & Catherine Booth had in mind for the SALVATION ARMY...

Thanks for the constructive discussion guys, keep it up! :)

Anonymous said...

Well done Sarah. You go girl.
Love and Prayers
Susan
XXXX

Evangelist for Christ said...

Hey you know i like your ideas, not 2 say that i agree with them all because i dont, i am also a officer kid, but i have grown up in the contemporary scene, i flippen love hillsong and its music. I am not a big fan of brass bands and songsters and dont like the timberals at all, but i dont think its the music that makes our Churhs unique, i was told that my church in tweed heads wasnt a proper salvaiton army because we lacked a brass band, songsters and timberals and our flag wasnt present in the church. But the thing is we were seeing salvaiton!! isnt that wat makes us a SALVATION army, and also our ministry to the least the last and the lost. SO if our programs and bands are working for the kingdom of God then i say get rid of them!!! if our corps arent growing and seeing souls saved then we arent a salvaiton army at all! we are just dead bones! you can chek out my blogs if you wish and feel free to disagree with me.

Evangelist for Christ said...

SO if our programs and bands are working for the kingdom of God then i say get rid of them!!

That is spoused to be arent working, my bad